May 2007 Archives: Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog

May 2007
Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

« April 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 31, 2007

Jack in the Box Scores Direct Hit on Angus Name

Jack in the Box logo The blogosphere is alight with the lawsuit recently fired off by CKE Restaurants over Jack in the Box’s new ads that makes a rather rude suggestion about the origin of the "Angus beef" which is served by CKE’s Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. You can see the ads in question below.

Jack in the Box better brace itself, because Burger King and McDonald’s also use Angus beef.

From the suit:

While Defendant may find humorous the aural and phonetic similarities between the words "Angus" and "anus," [the ads foster] the erroneous notion that all cuts of Angus beef are derived from the anus of beef cattle.

There is almost no way you can read that aloud without laughing. I’d say that I feel sorry for the lawyers who have to prosecute this except its simply too hard to pity lawyers getting involved in such a frivolous case.

On the other hand, there is a huge amount of brand name equity tied up in the quality usually associated with "Angus beef," and these ads are indeed quickly doing away with all that.

I wonder how it will be filed? CKE vs. Jack in the Box Re: Angus vs. Anus — possibly the most ridiculous name for a lawsuit in history.

Jack in the Box, for their part, defends itself by pointing to an ad by Carl’s Jr. that makes a clearly false but very humorous suggestion about why their milkshakes are superior to the rest:

Is it false advertising or simply excessively childish?

I’m not sure, but it will be very hard for me to think of the words "Angus beef" without thinking of Jack in the Box. Which is kind of the point.

Technorati Tags: Fast Food, Jack in the Box, McDonald's, Burger King, Angus, Sirloin

Posted by William Lozito at 9:43 AM

Posted to Food | Product Naming
Comments (2) | TrackBack

May 30, 2007

Brand Naming: A Naming Company's Best Friend

Alex Beam has a great column up in The Boston Globe entitled "It's a re-brand new world" that takes a hard look at the prodigious amount of renaming that's going on lately.

He looks at the very intelligent rebranding of Boston University as "Boston's University," a nice step up from "the third great University on the Charles."

He then takes a swipe at the Cingular/AT&T company name change, and goes on to to say: "Boston Scientific just rebranded its troubled Guidant brand of heart devices out of existence. Healthone Care System has rebranded itself as Atrius Health because of a name conflict with a Denver hospital network. Citigroup, Delta Air Lines, and even the Iraq war are all said to be in various stages of rebranding."

And while renaming and repositioning cemeteries, cities, and, indeed, countries (he has fun with Canada's new slogan "Keep Exploring," which I think is pretty good) may seem odd to the casual observer, we do it because naming matters. Slogans matter and even mascots matter.

I'd love to see a debate between Seth Godin and Mr. Beam. Seth just posted a great piece entitled "Naming: Of Renamed Brands and Previous Names." Seth says that in general, use an existing name with a great deal of recognition (think AT&T and Cingular), but change your product name or company name only grudgingly for three reasons:

A merger makes is a necessity
You need to simplify your brand architecture
Your current name has too much negative baggage.

Once you implement the change however, make a clean break with the old name and market the new name aggressively.

Technorati Tags: Boston University, Cingular, AT&T, Seth Godin, Delta Air Lines, Branding, Company Naming

May 29, 2007

Brand Naming: Are Bank Names Getting Blander?

According to the International Herald Tribune, big banks are trading up to brand names that reflect a global rather than regional reach to appeal to well-heeled customers who might do their banking in a number of countries.

Thus, Spanish Banco Santander Hispano recently changed its name to Santander and is doing away with the names of the banks it acquires.

HSBC and Citigroup have followed the suit. The danger, according to one exec, is creating "not a global brand but a global bland" as bank brand naming gets blander and more encompassing.

The problem, according to one blogger, is that "good bank brands make bad bank trademarks."

Bank brand naming is getting all the more confusing, as banks expand their reach, often treading on local company names as they do so.

According to the authors, "once-sleepy, small-town banks suddenly emerging as protagonists in national or even global trademark wars."
Who, for instance, is the real "First National Bank" or who can claim rights to the name "Savings Bank"?
Are these generic and descriptive or are they trademarkable?

Bankers also get in trouble for snapping up regional names: as in Winchester Federal Savings Bank vs. Winchester Bank, Inc.

Another blogger has found this out the hard way with the Bank of China; while another bank has hit upon a novel way of getting its boring brand name recognized.

Of course, as bank names get more wishy-washy, the names for bank robbers seem to be getting more panache.

The FBI now seems to be giving names to some of its more flamboyant targets: next time you are making a deposit at your local bank watch out for The Paparazzi bandit and the Panama Hat bandit.

Technorati Tags: Santander, Bank Names, Citigroup, Bank of China, Paparazzi Bandit, Panama Hat Bandit

May 26, 2007

Recent Sale, Book Highlight Value of Sex.Com and Porn.com Domain Names

It's a sad but true fact that seedy domain names are among the most valuable on the Internet. A recent story set to be printed in the UK Sunday Times explores about the utter skullduggery around the sex.com domain name, which was stolen by Stephen Michael Cohen from Gary Kremen in 1995, leading to a ten year man-hunt, a $65 mil court settlement and a detective story worthy of Sherlock Holmes.

You can read more in the new book by Kieren McCarthy entitled, of course, Sex.com. There seems to be a dispute over the actual article that is slated to appear tomorrow and an alternate article on the subject which he has also posted on his blog. The second version begins with the tongue in cheek statement by a Harvard professor that "The Internet is for porn."

Nobody could agree more than MXN, an Internet media and investment firm which last week bought the Porn.com domain name for $9.5 mil — the largest all cash domain transaction in history. This is the second largest domain sale overall after Sex.Com, which sold for $12 mil in cash and stock in 2005.

Technorati Tags: Kieren McCarthy, Domain Names, Porn, Pornography, Sex, sex.com, porn.com

Posted by William Lozito at 3:22 PM

Posted to Branding | Media and Entertainment | Naming
Comments (0) | TrackBack

May 25, 2007

The Evolution of the Victorinox Company Name

Thursday’s news that Victorinox, the company that makes Swiss army knives, has changed its name to Victorinox Swiss Army, got me thinking about the evolution of the company and the Swiss Army brand name.

Victorinox, for many people, doesn’t really mean “knives” any more, it means watches. Victorinox's blog certainly makes it seem like they are a watch company more than a knife company. I don’t see a knife anywhere on the opening posts.

But the term “Swiss Army” covers a great deal of ground nowadays, which is one of the reasons Victorinox wants to have those two recognizable words in its company name.

There’s a great post up by Michael Marcus describing the long standing competition between Wenger and Victorinox, both of which make “Swiss Army knives.” The term is generic and so essentially any company could trademark it as part of a product name. Not just anyone can use those words on their company name, though.

The first Swiss Army knife company, Victorinox, was founded in 1891 and found its biggest competitor only a few years later in 1893, when Wenger opened its doors. By mutual agreement Wenger advertises as “The Genuine Swiss Army Knife,” while Victorinox bills itself as “The Original Swiss Army Knife.”

Interestingly, the name “Swiss Army knife” was coined by American soldiers after WWII, who could not pronounce the original product name: Offiziersmesser.

Last year Victorinox bought Wenger, but the Wenger brand is very much still alive and is used to market briefcases, perfume and deodorant. Victorinox makes knives, watches and rescue tools.

Wenger also makes The Giant Swiss Army Knife, which frankly has to be seen to be believed. They also have a product name that might not be the right choice these days: the Traveler. When travelling, remember that knives of any size are not allowed on airplanes, and airport security will confiscate them.

The good news, though, is that one blogger seems to have found a place where you can buy all those confiscated Swiss Army knives.

Technorati Tags: Company Naming, Company Name Change, Victorinox, Wenger, Swiss Army, Product Naming

Posted by William Lozito at 11:39 AM

Posted to Company Naming | Product Naming | Sports and Recreation
Comments (0) | TrackBack

May 24, 2007

The Greatness Within the Everlast and George Foreman Brands

Everlast is revamping its brand identity including a new tagline, “Greatness is Within,” that demonstrates its fight to survive in the competitive athletic apparel and sporting goods market.

The new logo won't be officially launched until later this year and includes a refreshed logotype, a new icon and corporate colors.

Women’s Wear Daily pointed out that the company was looking for a “consistent message” as it moves to “premier brand caliber.” Everlast wants to emphasize its brand assets of “strength, dedication, individuality and authenticity.”

The new icon shows a vanishing perspective apparently symbolizing “infinity.” Clearly, Everlast is moving away from it’s old “rope-a-dope” brand image into one that might conceivably compete with Nike and Adidas, shooting for “premier athletic brand status” via their 72 licensees.

I think Everlast's current image is pure boxing and not general sports and fitness. Everlast even declares on its website that its name is synonymous with boxing. When I think of the Everlast brand name, I think of Mohammed Ali and Rocky Balboa. For me, the Everlast name conjures up visions of victory, yes, but also visions of pain and blood.

The lovable George Foreman has had something to do with making boxing and boxing-related branding more approachable. There certainly seems to be "greatness within" the George Foreman brand.

In fact, Monday’s announcement that Foreman is now co-team owner of IndyCar Panther Racing makes me think that there's nothing the Foreman brand can't take on. Well, almost nothing.

George Jr., Foreman’s eldest son, commented that, "our involvement with Panther Racing offers a tremendous opportunity to bring together two championship brands and cross-promote two sports powerhouses across a diverse fan base."

This co-branding deal, or "Panther Punch", as some are calling it, has the Panther team hoping to leverage Foreman's status as a champion brand.

Is the Everlast brand destined to be a champion, too?

Technorati Tags: Everlast, Greatness Is Within, Athletic Apparel, Rebranding, George Foreman, Athletic Brand, Panther Racing, Brand Names

May 23, 2007

Formica is Now a New Zealand Brand Name

Fascinating news that Formica Corporation has been sold to a New Zealand company. Formica has joined Xerox and Dumpster in the popular lexicon as a genericized brand name.

Like most people, I was under the impression that Formica was a type of laminated plastic, that lost its status as a trademarkable brand name.

I was interested to see that Cerberus was part of the sale of this legendary and quintessentially American brand name, which has been defined by Webster’s New World Dictionary as “a trademark for a laminated, heat-resistant thermosetting plastic used for table and sink tops.''

Formica has been around since 1913 when a young engineer created it for use as electrical insulation, and the name comes from the fact that the stuff can be used instead of mica, literally “for mica.”

Formica's product nomenclature includes VirrVarr, Atomic Orange and Aqua Boomerang. These are names left over from the fifties and I am interested to see what happens what New Zealanders and neighboring Australians make of them. And I wonder how “VirrVarr” will translate overseas.

I’m not sure we should be selling anything with the word Atomic, and Atomic Orange seems like a fairly agressive product name. But that would depend on the category and target market.

How about an Atomic Orange energy drink?

Of course the word boomerang may ring false with some Australians—or else it may be taken as a tribute to where boomerangs come from.

Technorati Tags: Formica, Genericized, Trademark, VirrVarr, Atomic Orange, Product Names, Branding

The Bad Hair Days of Product Naming

“While some people are known to have ‘bad hair’ days I feel like I’m currently going through a ‘bad product naming’ week,” writes the Epiacenter reviewer when faced with the HiPePC Driv-N CarPC and the Zonbu Zonbox.

It gets better, actually: the HiPePC is housed inside a Voom-PC-2 enclosure.

My favorite of all of these is the HiPe PC, because what it instantly brings to mind is “hype” as in “overhyped product.” I presume HiPe actually stands for “high performance,” but it’s woefully unsuccessful at conveying anything positive.

And “Driv-N CarPC” sounds like something made by Fisher Price for small children, quite apart from the fact that the driver had better not be doing any high-performance computing while the car is in motion.

“Zonbu Zonbox” has a certain funky charm, though it seems a bit twee for a technology product name. You’d expect it to be some form of media player, not a "low-cost, eco-friendly computing device” that runs Linux. Though admittedly the assorted flavors of Linux often have pretty funky names of their own; the Zonbox runs something called Gentoo.

Enough companies have “bad product naming days” that there’s an entire blog devoted to bad product names. We don’t like to be quite so negative here at NameWire, but they make some good points in their multi-part series about Web 2.0 names.

And we certainly can’t quarrel with their rationale for producing the blog: “A bad name for a product won’t leave a pleasant taste in your customer’s mouth, so please use consideration when naming your product or service.”

Technorati Tags: Bad Product Names, HiPePC, Zonbu, Epiacenter, Naming, Linux

Posted by Diane Prange at 7:35 AM

Posted to Consumer Electronics | Naming | Product Naming
Comments (2) | TrackBack

May 22, 2007

Hershey Fights to Protect Brand Name Trademarks

There’s a buzz on the blogosphere today about Hershey’s recent litigation against a fellow on his way to jail for selling marijuana-laced candy.

Seems as if this person made the mistake of not only selling an illegal product, he also violated Hershey’s trademarked names, offering the world product names like “Stoney Rancher,” “Rasta Reese’s” and “Keef Kat.”

These are direct trademark violations of Hershey’s Jolly Rancher, Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups and Kit Kat brand names.

Bottom line? He’s looking at a $100,000 fine on top of five years in the slammer for selling dope.

Seth Godin happens to have a great post up about trademarks today that discusses many important subjects relating to developing brand names and trademarks, including the danger of your brand name becoming generic, or what Seth’s associate calls “genericide.”

Godin points out that the best possible thing you can invent is “an idea that needs a name,” or something that is totally new and nameless (think Jeep, iPod).

But then again, a reader on Slashdot yesterday reported that Linux, certainly a unique sounding name for a totally unique product, shares its name with 204 other products, including a Swiss laundry detergent.

Technorati Tags: Hershey, Trademark Violation, Brand Names, Genericide, Linux

May 21, 2007

Brand Naming: Will NutraSweet Create Sweet Pure D’Light?

As you may already be aware, the makers of Equal sued the maker of Splenda, contending that Splenda had deceived millions of consumers by deliberately creating the impression that Splenda was healthier and natural because it started out with sugar, even though the final product has no sugar.

As Lynnley Browning of the New York Times reported a few weeks ago, the lawsuit highlights the fierce battle for leadership between later entry Splenda and one-time leader Equal in the $1.5 billion artificial sweetener market.

In a strategic response to the success of Splenda, NutraSweet is co-branding with competitor American Sugar Refining, Inc, who manufactures and markets the Domino sugar brand, to create a new brand name of sweetener called Domino Pure D’Lite, which is what the industry refers to as a light sugar product, or sugar blend.

The Pure D’Lite sub-brand will be endorsed by Domino and its packaging will carry the easily recognizable NutraSweet logo. It will be interesting to see if Pure D'Lite will help Nutrasweet reacapture market share lost to Splenda, who now dominates two-thirds of the U.S. market.

If there ever were an instance where a sub-brand is warranted, this is it, contrary to what some marketing gurus have to say about sub-brands.

NutraSweet has an association with aspartame that is pretty negative, so being associated with “pure” sugar may be a real boon, and help the brand leapfrog its aspartame-based competitors, such as Equal.

Technorati Tags: NutraSweet, Domino Sugar, Pure D'Lite, Cobranding, New Brand Name, Product Naming, Artificial Sweetener

Posted by William Lozito at 9:50 AM

Posted to Brand Naming | Branding | Food | Product Naming
Comments (2) | TrackBack

May 19, 2007

Can The Jaeger Brand Name Make a Comeback?

It seems as if the brand managers at Jaeger want to emulate Burberry and bring a "musty" old brand name back to life.

Jaeger is a UK fashion brand name that saw its best years decades ago (Audrey Hepburn liked it) before falling into a slump — in 2002 it closed its Madison Ave. flagship store.

The brand is named after a professor of zoology Gustav Jäger who wrote a book in the 1880’s detailing how humans could benefit from wearing animal fibres. The resultant company was called Dr. Jaeger's Sanitary Woolen System and became known for wool, cashmere and angora.

I’m surprised to note that there is such an interest in a brand that has essentially failed and is so old fashioned. Yet a new generation of investors believe that its worldwide recognizability and history could give it a new life, not least in New York, where there is a search on for a new flagship store, as well as in Asia.

Jaeger advertisement Is this an example of a zombie brand comeback?

Only a few years ago we saw Burberry make a tremendous comeback from the brand name your grandfather liked to the handbags Kate Moss favors: Burberry is so hot that it might even ditch its signature plaid, an integral part of its brand, I think, but customers don’t seem to miss it.

I’ve written before about brand names that never say die.

I am sure London Fog is watching Jaeger with interest.

Jaeger has a new fashion team, a new brand manager and a whole lot of new money behind it. It has a brand that perhaps never really goes out of style. If they play their cards right, they might just do it — and prove that brand name recognition and history can trump tough times.

Technorati Tags: Clothing, Fashion, Apparel, Jaeger, Burberry, London Fog, Zombie Brands

Posted by William Lozito at 2:09 PM

Posted to Apparel | Brand Naming | Branding
Comments (0) | TrackBack

May 18, 2007

To Masterbrand or Sub-brand? That is the Question

One of the oldest debates in branding is whether you introduce a new product under the existing parent brand or create a sub-brand name. Some marketing consultants essentially say that sub-brands don't work. That seems like an over-simplification to me, as well as not a universal truth.

Toyota is extending its Prius sub-brand for its hybrid vehicles, removing the Toyota moniker, and, in effect, creating a new parent brand. Does Toyota know what they're doing? I think so.

In the consumer's mind, I believe, Prius equals hybrid, green and good. Therefore, I think its wise that Toyota's new hybrid models, which we'll start to see in 2009, will be called Prius A, Prius B and Prius C.

However, I think the A, B and C nomenclature is a mistake. Anyone that's received a grade in school would much prefer to get an A than a C. And what happens when Toyota introduces its sixth Prius model? Would you want a Prius F?

If you've read this far, I've fooled you. The Prius A, B and C are only internal code names, once again demonstrating that Toyota knows what they're doing.

As you're probably aware by now, AT&T, which, a few months ago, was acquired by much bigger SBC Communications, which renamed itself AT&T despite its much larger size. That "was a bit like France marching into Brussels and renaming itself Belgium," said Stephanie Mehta of Fortune, in her article yesterday, Meet the new AT&T.

Although controversial, AT&T did away with the very well known and probably much hipper Cingular name. I predict that long-term, the Cingular brand will reemerge in some place in some way, like many other zombie brands.

Technorati Tags: Toyota, AT&T, Brand Naming, Prius, SBC Communications, Branding Strategy, Cingular, Masterbrand, Sub-brand

May 17, 2007

Crumpler Wants To Be A Naming Company

If voters compare candidates like boxes of cornflakes, do photographers shop for camera bags the way they’d buy real estate?

Crumpler seems to think so, given the fact that they produce a “Million Dollar Home” line of camera bags. These range from the 1 Million Dollar Home to the 7 Million Dollar Home—and there’s a Brazillion Dollar Home, as well.

As with homes, the higher numbers reflect greater square footage. The Brazillion Dollar home holds two SLR cameras and a laptop, with straps for your tripod. The Sherpa required to carry all of that is not included in the $280 price, however.

camo bag.png As a recent review of the 4 Million Dollar Home points out, Crumpler is known for its unique product naming schemes. And rightly so. “Crumpler” is a counter-intuitive name for a company that manufactures bags for fragile equipment. The last thing you want your camera or laptop to undergo is crumpling.

But that’s as nothing to the names of the bags themselves. In addition to the Million Dollar Home series, there’s:

the Bucket series
the Bundle series
the Customary and Sinking Barge (a name even less reassuring than “Crumpler”)
the Whickey and Cox (sounds like a pub, doesn't it?)
the Karachi Outpost
the Keystone

And that’s just in camera bags. There’s also:

a book (or beer) bag called the Hoax
laptop bags called the Salary Sacrifice and the Dreadful Embarrassment
a traveling bag called the Status Belly
a cell phone/accessory bag called the HooJah

The product descriptions are, if anything, crazier than the names. Which seems to be a big part of why they’re popular as far away as Kota Kinabalu.

It seems Crumpler uses different product names for its bags in Europe, which could get confusing. In England the bags go by completely different but equally outrageous names:

Pretty Boy
The Daily
The Warm Shower
Stripper Ripper

Maybe Crumpler employees all have a secret aspiration to work for naming companies. They certainly out-name competitors like Tamrac and Lowepro. Not that “Cyber Pro” and “Velocity” (Tamrac) are bad names; neither are “Vertex” and “Road Runner” (Lowepro).

But none of them are as memorably funky as the names of the Crumpler bags.

Technorati Tags: Crumpler, Million Dollar Home, Naming Company, Bag Names, Product Naming, Creative Names, Naming Schemes, Tamrac, Lowepro

May 16, 2007

Did Cerberus Save Chrysler From The Underworld?

Brian Dickerson of the Detroit Free Press wrote a wonderful article about Cerberus, a leading private investment firm, the company that bought Chrysler this week for $7.4 billion, and asks “why a company with $60 billion would name itself after a three-headed monster.”

By the way, in Greek mythology, Cerberus is a three-headed dog.

Seems that some investment groups like using terms from Greek mythology in their company naming—one of the least effective name changes from 2006 was Prime Rate Investors’ move to Summus Works. Say it fast, it sounds like “some of us works”.

But I would say that a quick look at a list of Investment Company names shows that names from mythology certainly do not dominate the field.

Because there are regulations over what an investment company can call itself, it seems logical that names from history and mythology that just look good—and neutral to regulators—may get some play.

Why would the founders of Cerberus choose that name? Chances are they liked the fact that it looked like the word “cerebral” from “cerebrum”, the Latin word for brain, neither of which have any relation to Cerberus, which is a Greek word.

But it is amusing that an investment company would (probably inadvertently) name itself after a three-headed dog protecting the gates of Hell. I have to say I do like Cerberus’s response: "Our firm was founded to keep companies that are in pretty bad shape from entering the underworld."

Which is exactly what they have done with Chrysler.

Nice save, guys.

Technorati Tags: Company Name Change, Chrysler, Daimler-Chrysler, Linguistic, Cerberus, Brian Dickerson, Greek Word

May 15, 2007

AMD New Phenom Brand Name

AMD’s new brand name for its next generation dual and quad core desktop processors is set to be Phenom, as in “Phenomenal” and not “Phenomenon.”

Phenom is what we refer to as a clipping. That is, phenom was clipped from the word phenomenal. With most of the English language trademarked, clipping of existing words is becoming a more common naming technique.

A potential downside in this instance is that Phenom may not be instantly pronounceable and require us to think about how it's pronounced. However, with time and money, the pronunciation of Phenom should become easier.

AMD plans on dropping the “64” add-on and they will make up AMD’s high-end product line: the Athlon X2 will stay awhile longer while the stand-alone Athlon brand is gone and the Sempron (single-core) will compete against the Celeron.

The Phenom brand name is a “metaphor for the company’s expectation for the chips,” which are set to compete against market dominator Intel. Phenom chips will be the ultra-pricey, ultra-powerful chips set to take advantage of the demands of Windows Vista.

Technorati Tags: AMD, Intel, Phenom Chip, Brand Architecture, Processor Names, New Brand Name, Phenom

Posted by William Lozito at 7:43 AM

Posted to Brand Architecture | Brand Naming | Product Naming | Technology
Comments (4) | TrackBack

May 14, 2007

Can the King of Beers Rule Vodka With the Pomacai Brand Name?

Anheuser-Busch has just filed an intent-to-use trademark application for the Pomacai brand name.

No, this isn’t a new beer: it’s vodka. And not just any vodka, according to what analyst Mark Swartzberg told the Wall Street Journal, but “a fruit-flavored vodka involving pomegranate and açaí, a fruit native to South America.”

That would make Pomacai a portmanteau name, but a more problematic one than, say, “Slentrol.” Brew Blog notes that açaí berries are popular in smoothies and juices, but the fruit is not a household name in America.

And even with the diacritical marks which are missing from the trademark application, pronunciation is far from obvious.

The name has the advantages of being both descriptive and exotic, but any alcoholic drink needs a good “Bar call.” People have to be able to say it out loud with confidence. And vodka is not a snooty drink for the French speaker, either.

Anheuser-Busch’s earlier ventures into the realm of spirits have much better bar calls. “Ku Soju” (a sort of sweet-potato vodka) is tidily phonetic, and “Jekyll and Hyde” liqueurs have a memorably funky name with a hint of danger.

Because of the difficulty with trademarking names, companies trademark more names than they end up using.

It’s entirely possible that when (and if) the vodka appears, it won’t be called “Pomacai.” Which would probably be a good thing for both Anheuser-Busch and vodka drinkers.

Technorati Tags: Anheuser-Busch, Pomacai, Mark Swartzberg, Vodka Brand Name, Trademark, Spirits Naming

Posted by Diane Prange at 11:55 AM

Posted to Brand Naming | Linguistics | Product Naming | Spirits
Comments (0) | TrackBack

AstroTurf Brand Name Back for Gameday

Sometimes its not so great when your name is the trailblazer in an industry. To generations of sports fans and athletes, there is only one recognizable brand name that is synonymous with artificial grass on playing fields: AstroTurf®.

But it seems that years of sprained ankles, rug burns and painful turf toes brought the company to its knees. By 2004 AstroTurf was bankrupt and the last old-school AstroTurf surface was ripped up in 2005.

It’s main competitor FieldTurf, who makes a kinder, gentler artificial grass, has declared the brand name dead, going so far as to erect a headstone to the name in one of their advertisements.

Jon Pritchett feels that the death of the AstroTurf brand name has been greatly exaggerated. In fact, he thinks he can capitalize on the brand name. His company, GeneralSports Venue, acquired the AstroTurf brand name last year, understanding that the brand’s history, which stretches back to 1966, has real equity.

His major competitors, FieldTurf and SprinTurf, have stayed close to the AstroTurf name, since it represents so much, like being the original innovator and creating the category.

Now, Pritchett has rights to an improved AstroTurf product, named Gameday Grass. Nice.

There is a resonance to the word “grass” among sports lovers - somehow games that are played on grass have an authenticity and grittiness to them that is hard to replicate. And most turfs are trying to be grass anyway... why not work the word grass into the product name?

I think that the idea of synthetic grass or “turf” bears little romance to fans or athletes anymore and I bet Pritchett will hit a home run.

Technorati Tags: AstroTurf, Brand Name, FieldTurf, Jon Pritchett, Brand Equity, SprinTurf, Gameday Grass, Product Naming

Posted by William Lozito at 10:19 AM

Posted to Brand Naming | Branding | Product Naming | Sports and Recreation
Comments (1) | TrackBack

Search

Categories

Subscribe

Recent Entries

Archives

Featured Blogs