the product naming blog

« Product Naming: To Apostrophe or Not to Apostrophe | Main | Links Du Jour 05-31-06 »

May 30, 2006

Brand Naming: Is Motorola’s SCPL Cutting Too Much?

MotorolaIf you’ve got one phone named after a razor, it makes thematic sense to have a second phone named after a scalpel. Slim, sharp, cutting edge—they’re all good connotations.

The problem comes when you start removing too many letters from a word. Motorola has decided to call its new phone “SCPL.”

“SCLPL” would be much clearer, I think, but using 5 letters would break the 4-letter Motorola naming convention (RAZR, SLVR, PEBL, ROKR).

But did Motorola put too much of a scalpel to the new brand name by removing all vowels and a consonant?

RAZR, ROKR, and PEBL are unambiguous. Each already contains a vowel, and there’s only one way to pronounce them and still come up with an English word. I actually thought SLVR stood for “silver” rather than “sliver” when I first saw it, but the mistake still produces a good name.

“Scalpel” may be just too hard to abbreviate. I think Motorola may have gone too far with the SCPL brand name. I am guessing that consumers will have more difficulty figuring out what SCPL stands for versus Motorola’s other reduced-vowel brand names.

It will be interesting to see how the target market perceives the SCPL name.

Here is what other blogs are saying about the SCPL name:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by William Lozito at May 30, 2006 1:16 PM
Posted to | | | | | | | |

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brand Naming: Is Motorola’s SCPL Cutting Too Much?:

» Product Naming: How Should Apple and Motorola Manage Their Nomenclature? from Strategic Name Development Product Naming Blog
In life and in marketing when something is overdone it can lose its impact. For instance, aren’t you tired of seeing movies where something is exploding, a car or building or whatever? Or a car running into a fruit stand or some other similar roadsid... [Read More]

Tracked on November 17, 2006 9:20 PM

Leave a comment